If You See Something: Graeme On Not Talking About His Favorite Stuff Enough

December 9, 2014

If there’s one thing that thinking about your personal Best Of lists at the end of the year means — and right now, I’m working on variations for three different outlets, including the podcast, so this is very much on my mind these days — it’s that you’ll realize how much time you spend talking about the things that you love. Or, in my case, how much time I don’t spend talking about the things that I love.

I should say, straight off, that I’m terrible at compiling these lists; there are always, always things that I completely forget about until it’s too late, and they’re usually things that, once pointed out, I react somewhere along the lines of ‘But that was my very most favorite! How could I forget that?’ I’ve started keeping notes that make no sense to anyone else, and occasionally not even to myself in the hopes that the important things will stick with me, at least. (The same is true of my day-to-day calendar in terms of deadlines and to-dos; those, at least, are simple to decipher, being along the list of DATE-OUTLET-SUBJECT. The only problem is when I haven’t quite worked out my argument or angle for a particular story and leave that last part somewhat vague. At one point, I had a note to myself that went “[DATE]-[OUTLET]-Something About Interstellar, With The Thing and How Many Times Its Been There.” By the time the date came up, I’d pretty much given up trying to remember what I meant and was trying to write something else that fit that description.)

saga_18_00_titlesIt was looking at those notes that I realized, there’s so much that I’ve enjoyed this year that I haven’t really spent a lot of time writing or talking about. Saga, weirdly, is one of those things — I feel like everyone talking about it a lot in the first year, but now that’s it’s just past the two-year mark, it’s just there, and despite the wobble surrounding Alana and Marko’s relationship in the most recent cycle of issues, it’s been consistently as good as ever. It’s just that I don’t really take note of that anymore.

Jeff Parker and Evan Shaner’s Flash Gordon, as well; for its run, it’s been one of the most consistently enjoyable (and beautifully illustrated) comics out there, but beyond the first couple of issues and Jeff and I occasionally nodding “Oh, it’s so good” to each other in passing on the podcast, issues come out without comment, for the most part. A lot of the Valiant books also fall under this for me; Harbinger ended up becoming the X-Men comic I always wanted but never knew, and yet I rarely comment on it, nor on how the Valiant line remains surprisingly, impressively strong in terms of creative output two years into its existence (I have found myself getting very drawn into the larger mythology of the shared universe, especially after seeing Dr. Silk from Unity pop up in Rai; also, The Valiant #1 is out tomorrow and I really, really enjoyed that book a lot. It has a sense of “epic” that most superhero events lack these days).

(This feels like a point where I want to say, ‘Hey, I should talk about Zero more, because it’s really one of my favorite series out there these days, and something that I feel is endlessly interesting and challenging, and yet I feel like I talk about it maybe once every six months or so. Zero, people; it’s really good and consider this me recommending it right here, in the middle of this stream-of-consciousness thing.)

Part of this is, I know, that it’s easier to complain about things — and, at least in my mind, more entertaining for the reader/listener, as well. There’s something to be said for positivity, of course, but saying “this is really good this is really good this is really good” all the time gets to be boring and turns into static after awhile, to me. Even if it’s broken up by packets of “and problematic but still” (See also: my feelings towards this year’s Doctor Who, which I ended up greatly enjoying, yet found myself thinking ‘Oh, this is troublesome’ a lot during). Fandom doesn’t necessarily make for good reading, he says, throwing only-quasi-intentional shade on those who feel that every comic book gets at least 3 out of 5 stars for effort.


And yet, I feel guilty, or at least frustrated with myself; I should be more vocal with what I’m enjoying, I find myself thinking, because I want to support it and if I think it’s good, maybe other people will as well. Not to mention, making myself consider what I’m a fan of, and trying to find the language to explain why, will make me a better writer and — who knows? — maybe even deeper my appreciation of the comic (or whatever) in the process, not to mention lessen whatever reputation as a hater that I’ve accidentally built up around me. It’s win/win, surely…?

I say this now, of course, entirely sincerely (but also fully prepared to fall back into bad habits almost immediately). There’s more to whatever Wait, What? is to me (and Jeff, I presume but I don’t want to talk for him, and anyway, he’s more positive and less willing to go for the cheap snarky gag in general than I am) than pointing out how fascinatingly screwed-up Jim Shooter’s Marvel work became, or complain about my lack of emotional connection with Jonathan Hickman’s writing — as much as both are important parts, as well. Maybe 2015 is the year when I turn towards the bright side, for once.

If nothing else, writing and talking more about stuff that I loved would make it a lot easier to compile Best Of lists every December. Goddammit, every year it’s far more difficult than it should be.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 comments on “If You See Something: Graeme On Not Talking About His Favorite Stuff Enough

  1. BrianMc Dec 10, 2014

    I think your initial podcast recommendation of Zero, which got me to try the first few issues from the money-sucking-engine that is Image Digital, came a week or two before some site-wide sale, so I got the whole series at an overall discount and really have liked it (so thanks very much). But just recently I’ve realized I don’t know what it’s about. I mean, I get E.Z.’s overall struggle, but there’s a lot of worldbuilding and such I don’t retain, issue to issue, that would allow me to put the individual pieces together. I need to sit down again and go through the whole series at once. Is that a sign that the series is great, or that it’s not doing enough to keep a reader fully engaged with each issue?

    Talking about unsung favorites, I’ll say that I’ve only recently begun running through Brian Wood’s Conan the Barbarian, the extended “Queen of the Black Coast” run, and holy crap, those are great comics that completely explode any preconceptions of what a Conan comic must be.

  2. Eric R Dec 11, 2014

    I’ve always felt that things that are bad or wrong with a piece of entertainment tend to be more obvious and easier to explain in general since they can be more singular, i.e. bad art or writing, while what works or is good tends to be an interplay of several things and is therefore harder to figure out exactly why it works. For example, bad art can easily defined because of poor figure work, bad inking or coloring, horrible perspective, etc., etc. With good art though it gets a lot more complicated. If they line work is great, is that because of the penciler, inker or a combination of the two and if the coloring is great is that because of the pallet the colorist uses, or how it’s used, and on and on.

    As for talking about the good stuff you’ve read, I’d rather listen to guys talk about stuff you have things to say about rather than stuff you feel you should have things to say about, if that distinction makes sense.

    Finally, maybe my memory is just kind of fuzzy on this but I’ve never felt that one of you was more negative than positive than the other on the podcast and if pushed I would probably say that Jeff was the more the “negative/snarky” one but again, not with 100% certainty. (Also, not saying this to make Jeff feel bad but to make Graeme feel better).

  3. Kwame Dec 15, 2014

    I like this post lots because I actually like gushing just as much as hating, you just have to have interesting thoughts on it. I do want to hear you gush more Graeme. I fear you might not, because you are so rarely actually blown away. Put in another way you have higher standards than Jeff, so more creative work is mediocre to you. But if you can gush more! Things that get me to gush that I love to hear other people gush about: Anything Frank Quitely, even more Jack Kirby, Stuart Immonen if you reading new fangled cap america you know! Also, you do talk about how much you like noble failures–I always find that talk fascinating and similar to my own thoughts.

    • Jeff Lester Dec 20, 2014


      Graeme has higher standards that *me*?! Why, I never…


      All that said, I thought this comment was great.