Continuity is Tribulation: Graeme on the new Captain Victory

August 4, 2014

If nothing else, you have to give Captain Victory and the Galactic Rangers credit for refusing to ape the Kirby aesthetic in any way. Oh, there are moments in the first issue where Joe Casey manages moments that feel appropriately Kirby-esque (The captions that explain “War can often breed sudden tragedy—as Captain Victory pays the ultimate price! And yet—this is where it all begins!” for example, have a rhythm and emphasis that feels true, to me), but this isn’t merely a cover version or rehash of what’s come before.

Captain Victory 1

The problem is, I’m not entirely sure what it is, just yet, either. The first issue feels very familiar, but I can’t quite place the source; for all the Kirby influence, I got a taste of Jonathan Lethem and Farel Dalrymple’s Omega the Unknown series from a few years back (and, from that, the echoes of Gerber/Skenes/Mooney’s original Omega, which feels like a very clear influence on one of the plot threads this issue introduces). There’s some Frank Miller in there, too, from the The Dark Knight Returns era, right at the end (or maybe it’s Alan Moore’s Halo Jones, with the unappealing slang: “Oh, biz. That bulldog riffer don’t look kosher t’me,” indeed). As obvious as it seems given the presence of Nathan Fox as primary artist, Paul Pope figures in here, somewhere, too.

If all of that sounds great, then—it is? Or almost is? The problem is, it doesn’t come together as a coherent whole just yet. I suspect that’s by design, at least partially. One of the ways in which this first issue rejects Kirby is by doing away with the concept of the issue complete and and of itself—while Kirby’s original Captain Victory was arguably his most serialized work, in many ways, this new Dynamite series is going to be even more demanding on the reader’s patience, with the first issue throwing out at least three disparate threads to follow up in future issues, with at two very much teases or previews instead of anything more substantial.

Another difference this series has from Kirby—and also the earlier Dynamite revivals of his characters, as well as the even earlier Topps revivals—is the removal of the dynamic omniscient narrator outside of the opening pages. It’s an interesting tactic that works, I think: we start with something approaching the character and set-up as we know it, and then as disaster strikes, our expectations fall away and we’re left in this new world (or, to be precise, three new worlds) without a guide. There’s a sense of… uncertainty, perhaps, and something else that seems appropriate to the story/stories being told that’s appealing.

Captain Victory 2And, of course, the book looks amazing. The jam structure works well—Fox takes on the main narrative, with Jim Rugg and Ulises Farinas illustrating very specific sequences that break from that main story, so that it doesn’t feel as fragmented as some books with multiple artists; everything feels deliberate and coherent, even if it rejects a lot of the wonderful, still-attractive-to-these-eyes Kirby aesthetic (By which I mean his storytelling as much as his character design or dynamism; Kirby was a very controlled artist in his pacing, whereas this is much more freewheeling).

Whether or not the new Captain Victory works for you isn’t as much of a Kirby thing as previous attempts at revival, but instead a test of your willingness to sign onto something that remains almost as much of a mystery in terms of its intent and direction after its first issue as it did before the series launched. Me, I know this isn’t perfect and could easily fall into prevention or, worse, incoherence all too easily, and yet, I’m on board. There’s something about not knowing that appeals, and if nothing else, it’s a beautiful book. On some level, Kirby would be proud.

(For those wondering: You’ve not missed this issue last week; it’s out this Wednesday–I got an early preview copy from Dynamite.)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 comments on “Continuity is Tribulation: Graeme on the new Captain Victory

  1. I have the feeling that Casey didn’t look at anything else that happened in the industry since his heyday in the early 2000s. In a way it’s refreshing that he doesn’t try to make the new Saga or the new TWD or his pitch for a TV show that’s like Lost but in the woods or in the White House or in a boarding school, but he keeps having a go at some things that don’t really have any more life in them. The superhero in “real life”(corporate superhero, asshole superhero, tv show superhero), the Kirby pastiche, the genre deconstruction that doesn’t say all that much compared to other genre deconstructions. Maybe if he left them alone for a while they could become vital again. And he carries on the insane amount of decompression from those years. Which is all that more frustrating since he is one of the more verbose writers out there.

    Now, maybe he looked at Prophet, hence the jam aspect of the book. But Prophet worked so well because it had the extremely simple, clear and visceral first arc.

    At least he brings the spotlight over some good artists that aren’t all that visible and well known. Now I wonder if Casey wouldn’t play a lot more to his strengths if he were an editor.

    • Maybe so Alin R., but Casey’s in a very comfortable financial position thanks to his Man of Action works (Ben 10, Generator Rex, Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon) etc. that he doesn’t really have a stake in the success of his comics. He can just do them as a hobby, since his day job is a key position in Disney XD and Cartoon Network’s most successful franchises. (This isn’t meant to denigrate him, and if I were in the same position, I’d probably take the same approach to the comic work I do).

  2. Dasbender Aug 5, 2014

    What’s the general concept behind Captain Victory? I never read the originals, or the Topps revival. Wikipedia only talks about its publishing history, that it was made by Jack Kirby, and that it has an implied connection to the New Gods. Is there anything else to it? I assume it’s sci-fi space stuff? Any other hook?

    “Created by Jack Kirby” long ago isn’t enough to get me to sign up for a new serialized story. Nor is “Joe Casey.” Although “Nathan Fox & Jim Rugg” gets really close to me buying it sight-unseen.

    Graeme, I really appreciate a review that explores influences, themes, and style. That’s key stuff. I hate reviews that just tell you what happened in the book and nothing more. Those aren’t critiques. But without any skeleton to wrap your observations around, I can’t hypothesize whether or not I’d enjoy it.

    Or is the problem that you’re not even sure what’s happening in it yet yourself?

    • That’s part of it — the general framework of Kirby’s version is essentially “Cosmic Space Peacekeeping Force, Where Each Member Has Multiple Clone Bodies So As To Allow Them To Die Multiple Times in The Name of Duty,” but Casey takes a left turn with the latter part of that and does something that would spoil the first issue to reveal — where he’s going beyond that isn’t exactly clear. Sorry that it made no sense to you without proper context. My fault!

      • Dasbender Aug 7, 2014

        Which I now realize I would’ve understood had I listened to the last podcast. *Literally* just listening to it today ;)

        That’s what I get for consuming my Wait,What content out of order. Thanks for the clarification!