So I was talking to a comic industry professional the other day — someone who’d undoubtedly be amused that I described them that way, but still — about the June DC launches announced last week, and they made the suggestion that said launches were doomed to failure, and a sign that DC had given up competing with Marvel in any meaningful way.

When they said that, I had this moment of No, that’s too cynical, there’s an audience for this, but my optimism and faith in the comics industry was quickly dashed by the announcement, hours later, of Marvel’s A-Force — a new Avengers book that repeats the all-female gimmick of Brian Wood’s X-Men, but this time with a nonsensical name (Did X-Force sound this dumb when it launched? Probably) and a Secret Wars tie-in. Sound ridiculous and kind of flat? Perhaps, but according to some folks at some websites I know, the traffic and engagement for that story way outstripped the DC announcements.

Something about that stung; the announcement of 24 new series, including some genuinely unexpected choices both in terms of content (A new Prez series? Even with the Green Team revival awhile back, who the hell saw that coming?) and creators, apparently effortlessly eclipsed by what’s essentially a run of the mill Avengers launch?

(It’s not entirely run of the mill, I know that — G. Willow Wilson and Margueritte Bennett is a great co-writing team, and the all-female gimmick is going to remain a potent one considering the growing interest in superhero diversity and the oppressive lack of same in the industry today. But still: 24 new series, including Annie Wu and Irene Koh on Black Canary or David Walker writing Cyborg, and people are really more excited about a new Avengers book…?)

At first I thought it was more evidence of Marvel’s dominance of the market, and the subsequent (weird, laughable) belief in many minds that anything with the Marvel logo is inherently superior to the alternative, but I’m not so convinced anymore; the apparent lack of interest surrounding the Garth Ennis Secret Wars book, or the M.O.D.O.K. book feels very telling, as well. It’s not a bias towards Marvel at the cost of anything else, it’s… something else. A conservatism towards the known, an eagerness to embrace brand names.

The response to the Sony/Marvel Spider-Man movie news reinforced this. Such excitement over the fact that, hey, that company that makes the superhero movies we love is making this other superhero movie series that we want to love but don’t: seeing headlines, written without irony, saying “This Changes Everything.”

All of which is to say: part of me is almost glad that these new stories were announced at a time when Jeff and I wouldn’t have a chance to talk about them on the podcast; instead of feeling excited by things that I really should be — and was, in the case of the DC announcements, before I realized how little people apparently cared about getting what they say they want — I just feel distanced from it all, and somewhat grumpy towards comics fandom as a whole.

Of course, when Marvel finally gets around to announcing Secret Wars: Englehartworld, just watch me change my tune so fast your head will spin.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Obviously, I’ve become hooked on embedding YouTube clips in our browser.  Dunno why, and I think it’s arguable that it’s more than a little insulting to put video in a comics podcast blog but…eh.  I’m sure it’s a phase I’ll grow out of.

Anyway, welcome from the far-flung past!  This is being posted from the road as the missus and I find ourselves on the rocky shoals of uncertainty  (not the most beguiling name, but it’s hard to beat the hotel rates) for a few days.  (And yes, that means no recording this week so no podcast next week but Graeme and I promise to make it up to you. We really, really do.)

So, let’s jump in with those show notes, shall we?  Please note that: (a) this was recorded the evening *before* DC broke the Internet with its list of new titles and new creative teams so…if you’re hoping to hear our reactions to that news, you’re kind of out of luck?, and (b) if you want to have a player-free link to this episode, and you don’t like iTunes, or our RSS feed, or Stitcher, then go to the first comment and copy and paste it.  I realized Graeme did a kind of neat thing with the first ep. of Baxter Building where he just linked to the dang episode.  Was that a thing you guys liked?  Should I start doing that?  Please let us know until we muster the time, resources, and wherewithal to handle The WordPress Podcasting Template Nobody Likes.

That said, tally-ho, hey?

00:00-22:27: Greetings from Plague Central! Graeme has a very congested update about Portland being “Lurgy Town.” We hope you like listening to discussions about illness, hypochondria, Graeme’s health care, and Jeff’s very apparent worry that he is the latter. Believe it or not, this very long non-comics discussion pays off later. Comics talk more or less enters the equation with a discussion of “Little Annie Fanny” around the 16:28 mark.

LAF-ST-TROPEZ-SPLASH

To be fair to Kurtzman & Elder, there were a few stunning pages I passed up due to size consideration…

22:27-25:41: As Graeme puts it, “To sum up: I’m sick; Jeff’s going on a trip next week.” So consider yourself officially warned that next week will be a skip week, and that although Graeme qualifies for the “Hefner,” Jeff will be lucky if he can get covered under the “Guccione.” Which is finally, somehow, the proper transition to discuss…
25:41-29:18: COMICS! First up: Locke & Key! Graeme’s read it, Jeff hasn’t, so of course guess who monopolizes the conversation about it? (Hint: it’s not Graeme.)

LockeKeyImage

Pretty, right? Clearly, Graeme is on to something…

29:18-42:26: And then, that silliness, out of the way, we both get to talk about Nameless #1 by Grant Morrison, Chris Burnham and Nathan Fairbairn, and also how we think Morrison is in full-on personal renaissance mode what with his work also on Multiversity and Annihilator.

Nameless2

Yup, I reused the image from Graeme’s review…

Jeff references a post by Marc Singer that most definitely does not agree. But although we dive into that more later, this section is very much our appreciation for this very strong first issue that is strangely joyful, and far less forced than Morrison’s earlier similar-in-some-ways, dissimilar-in-many-other-ways Happy. Jeff also thinks if you liked Nameless #1, you should check out the excellent words-without-pictures book Love Is the Law by Nick Mamatas.

MultiUse

Really, there’s no topping the phrase “Krakkin Ex,” is there?

42:26-1:09:10:  As mentioned above, The Multiversity Guidebook! by Grant Morrison, and a slew of artists including great stuff by Marcus To (Chibi and Atomic Batman!) and Paulo Siqueira (Earth Kirby!).  We talk about their great work briefly, but we also have ideas about the Empty Hand and what it means, both in-story and most especially thematically? We try to dig in deep about what we think it all means and how we think it’s all going to end.

superman-38-cover-full-jpg

(I love that Superman’s face looks like it’s been drawn by Gilbert Hernandez…)

1:09:10-1:26:49: You’d think there’d be a modern-rock band called Ridiculous, wouldn’t you?  So that DJs on boring radio stations could go, “And now, moving from Ridiculous to Sublime…”? Like, wouldn’t you get at least some kind of sustained royalties out of that considering the fact that radio stations still play Sublime songs for some insane reason?  Anyway, we went from talking about The Multiversity Guidebook to Superman #38 by Geoff Johns and John Romita, Jr. so maybe you can figure out where my head was at to start thinking about things ridiculous and sublime.
NOTE:  Full spoilers for Superman #38, in case you’re worried about that kind of thing.
HISTORICAL NOTE:  this podcast wrapped a mere hour before Geoff Johns announced he was leaving Superman with issue #39, which I think would’ve greatly changed the tenor of our conversation (well, it certainly would’ve changed Jeff’s point of view) but, eh, what can you do?  Also, I’m sure you’ve seen the list of all the new teams and titles coming from DC.  THAT got announced a mere twelve hours after we recorded.  So yeah, we’re pretty much a charming historical document already…albeit one that discusses Superman’s new power, Jimmy Olsen’s new role, and much more. I only wish we could’ve talked about how exciting the possibility of Gene Yang writing Superman is. Discussed instead: the “superhero vs. his clothes” trope; Scott Lobdell stories; Futures End vs. Earth 2: World’s End vs. Batman Eternal vs. the DC All Access page about Batman Eternal; and more.

Sculptor_1_620

And then, much arguing between Graeme and Jeff ensued….

1:26:49-2:05:55:  FEINT! Jeff was supposed to run down a list of comics he’s read recently, but instead steers discussion to Scott McCloud’s The Sculptor, out now and available from First Second.  Also discussed:  the mastery of Understanding Comics; the misfiring of Reinventing Comics, and the mystery of Making Comics (well, partial mystery in that Jeff hasn’t read it but Graeme has), the P.R. blitz around The Sculptor, and finally a very long discussion about the book, including Jeff and Graeme arguing about just about everything, related to the book, despite having very similar takes. Yayyyyy!
2:05:55-end: Closing comments! Here’s our schedule! Graeme makes promises about our upcoming episodes!  Mason & Tote Bags! Places to look for us at—Stitcher! Itunes! Twitter! Tumblr! and, of course, on Patreon where, as of this count, 94 patrons make this whole thing possible.
So, there you have it, yeah?  Check out the first comment if you need that link, go back to Ep. 167 and listen to enter and win our Rogue Trooper contest, and thank you for listening!  We shall return in two weeks with the next ep. of Baxter Building (listen to our first episode if you haven’t, or read issues #13-24 along with us), and then more Waiting and Whating than you can shake a longbox at!
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

I can’t really say I’m looking forward to Netflix’s Daredevil TV miniseries, but I have a certain ghoulish anticipation for it.  Or maybe I should say I had a ghoulish anticipation for it because after watching the trailer above, I’m realizing how dreary the show promises to be.  In that way, although Daredevil (the Netflix show) reminds me of Daredevil (the movie) and Daredevil (The Incredible Hulk stealth pilot with Rex Smith)—and even Daredevil (the comic book)—it mostly reminds me of Showgirls (the motion picture), which I saw in the theater on first release.  Showgirls taught me some very important lessons about the nature of camp, one of which is I’m apparently neither cruel enough or masochistic enough to appreciate it in its modern incarnation: turns out it’s just as hard for me to laugh with filmmakers with a cruel sense of humor as it is for me to laugh at filmmakers with no sense of humor at all.

And hoo boy, does Netdevil appear to fall into the latter category.  In its first eleven seconds, the trailer jams in three cliched images—the anonymous waterfront meeting, the rain-slickened streets, and the confession in church—of which the only innovation is the blind man’s cane wavering over those aforementioned rain-slickened streets.  Before the ninety seconds are through, we get diseased urban landscapes a la David Fincher, some pretty unconvincing wirework, a bunch of explosions, somebody stabbed a lot, stealth appearances by Stick and The Kingpin, concerned looking white people with bad haircuts (Karen and Foggy?), and a shot of Daredevil lifting himself from a puddle with blood drooling out his mouth.  It’s enough to make a guy nostalgic for an atrocious playground flirt/fight.

Look, I was enamored of Joe Carnahan’s sizzle reel as anyone (the NC-17 version of which is below):

but part of what makes it so exciting and smart is that it very specifically positions itself as a period piece. I adore Frank Miller’s work on Daredevil—both runs, the miniseries, the graphic novels, that single issue drawn by John Buscema, all of it—but part of what makes it work so well is how he saw New York as a location barely a half step up from hell.  (Miller grew up drawing crime comics, but coming to New York City and getting mugged was one of the best things to happen to his career.)

And it’s not a New York that exists in that way anymore: judging from its trailer, Netdevil is filmed in modern-day New York, a city that might as well be its anemic twin, Vancouver:  these days, Daredevil would be busting up the thugs at Josie’s Hot Yoga, tossing Turk and Grotto through  the window of The Apple Store.

But I doubt he will be.  Instead, he’ll be struggling with his violent nature in stock situations at stock locations, a black pair of tights pulled over his head so that we can all sit in front of our monitors exasperated that the criminals can’t figure out his secret superpower.

After watching the trailer I tweeted:

which I’m sure those who know Graeme’s musical taste will recognize as my blatant attempt to get him to talk to me on Twitter about it.  It didn’t work—poor guy was probably busy having to turn his thoughts into three different think pieces at the same time—but I did get a few other replies which took my idea and made it even better

and especially:

but also:

Part of this may just be us olds having a laugh, but it did make me wonder.  In the wake of Guardians of the Galaxy‘s colossal success, why not make something a little more candy-colored and fun than what we’re getting?

Not only does Marvel have arguably very little to lose in this whole TV deal, it actually has even less to lose with material be co-funded and shown on Netflix.  Unlike Agents of SHIELD, there’s no need to spin lukewarm or cooling ratings.  They have the freedom to make the material a little more offbeat than what one might expect from a superhero crime show.  Some of Marvel’s fans are quick to compare every move of the company to DC and Warner Brothers such that the latter always looks bad compared to the former:  what would be a bigger tweak to DC’s nose than making a show much closer to Batman ’66 as DC grumbles and rumbles on about Batman v. Superman Dawn of Justice?

Doing so would also give Marvel someplace to go with Daredevil, in that a second season could then start to make things darker, closer to Miller’s run. And by the time you get to Season Three or Four, you can move toward something like “Born Again”…or you’re well positioned to do something like Ann Nocenti’s run, where the darkness and the absurdity freely intermingled. Or both.  And maybe one of the other characters in Netflix’s The Defenders will be the trickster character, the one who gets the laugh lines…but hearing them from the blind guy might’ve worked.

Miller brought Daredevil to some very, very dark places, but part of what made it all the darker for me was how colorful and dumb previous issues of the book had been and how much they could move back to that place.  It made Daredevil the genuine undiagnosed bipolar superhero, upbeat and joking in one run, curled in a gutter in the next…and the extent to which that went untreated, undiagnosed, and unaddressed was to me far more haunting  and meaningful than “I like to beat people up because I’m the child of a boxer and a nun.”

But we’ll see.  Ninety seconds do not a thirteen episode series make, right?  But, as always—and in some ways, now more than ever—I’m glad we had the comics before the world got the movie… and the stealth pilot… and the TV show.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

I’ll be honest: I have started, and then discarded, attempts to write about Nameless #1 countless times today. Maybe somewhere in the region of ten attempts so far? I keep on starting and thinking I know, I’ll say this and then, somehow, everything goes south.

As frustrating as that is, it also feels oddly fitting; one of the things I really appreciated about the issue was how chaotic it felt, how it seemingly tumbles from one set-up to another in its initial pages, as if it’s unsure of what the book is going to be before deciding (Is it a Scottish Hellblazer? Is it an Inception rip-off-slash-parody where the nature of reality is going to be constantly upended? Is it another of Grant Morrison’s attempts to revive the entertainment of his youth by reappropriating images out of context and hoping that their significance will resonate nonetheless? Maybe it’s all of those and more). It’s not as if this issue really rejects analysis, but it’s almost intentionally constructed to find ways to try and twist away from it if at all possible.

And, really, that careening out of control feeling was one of the things I liked so much about the issue; the idea that I didn’t know where it was going next, or even if Morrison and artist Chris Burnham knew themselves — were they trying on ideas and high concepts like clothes, discarding what didn’t really suit them as I read? Burnham’s art (and especially his art with Nathan Fairbairn’s coloring, which is outstanding here) is another plus, taking the playfulness and formalism of their Batman, Incorporated work further here, while managing to evoke the creepiness that that title hinted at at its best. There’s a lot of beautiful, subtle stuff going on that’s hidden by the boldness on show elsewhere — look at the way the panel layout gets more inventive and unexpected when the story heads away from “reality,” and check how that impacts the color palette, for example — but look at what Burnham and Fairbairn do when they are more firmly rooted in reality, it’s just great stuff.

Nameless2

And that’s not even what I liked most about the issue. No, what I liked most — as silly as it sounds — was the Scottishness of the whole thing. Recognizing locations at a couple of times, or the way the dialogue of the main character feels so very Scottish in a way that Morrison rarely attempts. There’s a line early on in the book (one I won’t reproduce here, because it contains a word some find offensive and I don’t want to appall) that can only work in a Scottish accent in my head, and it was the line at which my interest went from Maybe this will be okay, in a weird horror kind of way to What is Morrison doing here? This is something else. It was a sign of things (or, at least, my interest level) to come.

Nameless1

It struck me, reading and re-reading Nameless #1 that Morrison is in yet another career renaissance right now; this, and last week’s Multiversity Guidebook and the run of Annihilator so far, are works that feel as energized and vital as anything he’s done in the last decade, surprisingly. Whatever was weighing him down in the last few years — the experience of working inside the beginnings of the New 52, perhaps, or just personal stuff that fed into his work — feels absent, with these new books seeming more exciting (and more varied!) than the output of men half his age.

It could all go wrong. In fact, it’s tempting to be snarky and say that Morrison has demonstrated that at some point in all of his projects, it will, even if he’ll inevitably pull everything together in a satisfying way in the end. But for now, Nameless feels like another interesting comic that delivers what you expect in ways you don’t expect it from a writer who’s rediscovered his taste for doing that very thing, working with artists who are ready to take whatever he gives them and match him in terms of intensity and inventiveness. Even if it’s hard for me to write about it, it’s definitely something worth reading.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
MK cover

All rise; court is now in session.

Jeff’s Initial Statement:  Moon Knight #1-12 is a series of comic books by Brian Michael Bendis, Alex Maleev, Matt Hollingsworth, and Chris Eilopoulos, published in 2013 by Marvel and currently available on its service, Marvel Unlimited.

Jeff’s Initial Disclosure Regarding Brian Michael Bendis:  I was once a fan of Brian Michael Bendis’ work, not so much Fire and Jinx and Torso (although I had all those), but Powers and Ultimate Spider-Man and Daredevil.  At a certain point, however, perhaps twenty or so issues into his Avengers run, a certain dissatisfaction with Bendis’s working habits became a more quarrellous form of discontent. And after the publishing schedule on Powers became erratic, after Brian Michael Bendis left Daredevil, and after Ultimate Spider-Man began to feel moribund (post issue #120 or so), I stopped buying Brian Michael Bendis’ work, and would only occasionally check it out on the stands to see if that discontent remained.

(Additional necessary disclosures and review after the cut.) Continue reading

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Reading Bitch Planet #2 and Casanova: Acedia #1 this weekend, I kept returning to an idea that I’ve mentioned more than once on the podcast — my belief that, often, I’m more at fault than the material when something doesn’t work for me. (More after the cut, because there’s a new episode of the podcast in the post below.) Continue reading

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
Jim3

Your Little Glowing Friend

Okay, papa’s diving right in here because papa’s only got a few hours before he has to take his computer in to get looked at and hopefully fixed. Remember, if you just want a straight link to the podcast and don’t want to fuss with our player, or our RSS feed, or Stitcher or iTunes or anything, look to this post’s first comment where you can grab something to copy and paste to your preferences.  Okay?  Okay.

And I’m tucking the rest of this sucker behind the jump because this is a *heavy* image post.

Continue reading

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
sleepy

fun in three panels or less

After spending last week writing about a guilty pleasure, it’s fun to turn around this week and confess how much I enjoyed this latest issue of Batman & Robin by Peter Tomasi, Patrick Gleason, Mick Gray, and John Kalisz.

Because this is the kind of book I would’ve been tempted to describe as a guilty pleasure a few years back, though maybe only for the most mistaken of reasons.  After all, calling something a “guilty pleasure” is to acknowledge upfront its shortcomings, even if only in the public opinion. And there’s something about this book that continues to make me uncomfortable about recommending it or appreciating it, even while reading this, the best issue of the title I’ve read in a while and probably the book I enjoyed reading the most out of the (counts on fingers and toes) eighteen comics I’ve read today.

[More after the jump, because there’s Graeme and Baxter Building below and you should miss neither, yeah?]

Continue reading

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

First off, there’s the first episode of Baxter Building, our long-awaited Fantastic Four readthrough, right below this post. I’ll cut the main part of this off under the jump and let you scroll down and enjoy it. Secondly, look at me — my fear about having to delay this until Wednesday this week turned out not to be the case! Continue reading

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

What’s that, you say? You were looking forward to Baxter Building, our in-depth look at the first 416-issue of Marvel’s Fantastic Four? We’ll see if you’re still saying that after this uber-sized first episode, in which we talk about the series’ first 12 issues. I remember saying to Jeff “I really want to go deep on the first 12, because the series changes so much during that time.” Little did I know that we’d go quite so deep…! Shownotes below, and for those who want their choice to listen elsewhere, you can find this episode on Stitcher and iTunes. Please be kind. It’s our first time.

Jeff (left) and I (right) plan the first episode of the series.

Jeff (left) and I (right) plan the first episode of the series.

0:00:00-0:02:27: The origin of the theme music and the title for the podcast. Literally, we were making this up as we were going along, in case it’s not obvious. “People, you’re getting to hear the origins right now,” as I say in the episode itself.
0:02:27-0:05:27: For any newcomers, Jeff and I run down just what we’re reading, and how to read along. (This would probably be a good place to put a link to Marvel Unlimited, considering we mention it for those who’re looking for ways to read along with us.)

ff1

Sue Storm fails to realize that actually being visible when in cabs might make her life a lot easier.

0:05:27-0:24:40: The first issue, and the many ways in which it seems unlike the team as we know them today — including the literalness of the the original Fantastic Four flare, Sue Storm’s bad choices when it comes to transportation, the familiarity to both monster comics and Kirby’s own Challengers of the Unknown, the importance of the Human Torch in the early issues, and much, much more. (Also discussed: Stan Lee’s inability to understand science, the early pacing issues and possible reasons for that, and the disconnect between image and text in that first issue. Not to mention, what’s missing from the first issue: Stan Lee being Stan Lee.)
0:24:40-0:28:00: “The first issue is scary!” The ways in which the first Fantastic Four hints at later superhero comics, by making superheroes something just a little less terrifying by the monsters they fight. Is there a Lovecraft connection with the book’s title?
0:28:01-0:33:55: The wonderful fake-out of the opening of Fantastic Four #2, and why it’s a trick that could only work once — and at this particular point in the series. Also, why do the Fantastic Four have so many hiding places, and in what ways is this issue like Lee and Kirby’s Hulk?

ff3

Johnny, get your gun.

0:33:55-0:39:10: The first element of Lee and Kirby being meta-textual. It won’t be the last. Also, even more problems with the pacing and potential plot problems, because apparently no-one was really paying attention to what was happening in with the story of these first issues until it was too late.

ff5

“Costumes… tights… that’s kid stuff!”

0:39:10-0:48:00: Fantastic Four suddenly embraces the superhero-ness of it all, starting with the third issue. Jeff also brings out the importance of the urban nature of the stories, and the way in which the Fantastic Four have been part of the city, while I suggest that things are starting to change even by this issue. Also: the first appearance of the Baxter Building! The first appearance of the Fantasti-Car and the Fantastic Four costumes, and how off-handed it all seems! Are Lee and Kirby having their cake and eating it by making a big deal of the “new” Fantastic Four even as they have the characters make fun of them? Plus! Who is Jeff’s breakout character of the series to date? The answer will surprise you (because, seriously, who’s ever given this character a second thought before now?)
0:48:00-0:53:10: Referencing Fantastic Four (1961-89) was The Great American Novel, we discuss whether or not the swiftly changing social standing of the FF was a reflection of Lee and Kirby’s success with the book, or simply something that all superhero comics have to deal with. How does Stan Lee deal with the concept of the underdog? (Spoiler: not that well.)
0:53:10-0:57:14: The first letters page brings a handful of great surprises, including the origins of Stan Lee’s self-mythology. Guest-starring a member of the Marvel Bullpen! We then return to the story in progress, with Jeff selecting a scene that he hopes will definitely show up in this summer’s Fantastic Four movie, while also describing the climax of the issue’s plot thusly: “Oh, come on.”
0:57:14-1:00:00: The strange magic of Fantastic Four #4 is revealed for both Jeff and myself, oddly enough. Is this the greatest introduction to the team? In the words of Chris Claremont, “Maybe so! Maybe no!” (If this issue was in Bring On The Bad Guys, let us know? The Internet failed me when I looked into it.)

Kirby's Bowery is genuinely amazing.

Kirby’s Bowery is genuinely amazing.

1:00:00-1:15:25: We dig into the sheer Kirby-ness of FF #4, from the weird comedy to both the impressive depictions of the Bowery and a couple of instances where he predicts pop art years before it goes mainstream. Seriously, this is such a great, great issue — albeit an uneven one in terms of tone and a “disquieting” one, to use Jeff’s term. Is that Kirby’s fault? Trigger Warning: this sequence features the words “Then there’s the fucking whale with hands.”

The Tick Tick Tick panels that Jeff and I both love so much.

The Tick Tick Tick panels that Jeff and I both love so much.

1:15:25-1:31:22: We reach the first appearance of Doctor Doom, whose very first panel really tells you everything you need to know about him, and how perfectly Kirby captures his origin sequence — just before the story swerves in a direction that no-one could see coming, because what the hell, everyone. Before any of that happens, though, Roy Thomas pops up in the letters page and we ask the important questions: Why do travelers in the past have pirate disguise kits? Is the Thing cursed? And is this the end of the beginning of Ben Grimm?

The Yancy Street Gang's main purpose in their first appearance? Humanizing the Thing.

The Yancy Street Gang’s main purpose in their first appearance? Humanizing the Thing.

1:31:22-1:38:30: Finally, we reach the sixth issue — by now, you’re realizing quite why this episode is as long as it is — just as the Fantastic Four become outright celebrities, and the Yancy Street Gang make their debut. “This is a quantum leap forward!” Jeff says, and impressively neither of us make a Scott Bakula reference. I’m sorry. Despite that, we get through this one relatively quickly because it’s not a favorite, and manages to diminish everyone involved (although Jeff does make a good case for this issue being a stealth reboot of the Sub-Mariner, just two issues after his debut in the Marvel Age of Comics).
1:38:30-1:44:41: Jeff’s not a massive fan of Fantastic Four #7, but I love it. Who knows quite what happened to Lee and Kirby for “Prisoners of Kurrgo, Master of Planet X,” but Jeff’s entirely right when he says that it could’ve been a Simpsons episode. If you’ve been looking for alien Lazy Susans and Reed Richards’ bong, then this issue is exactly what you want, and there’s also the added benefit of Reed revealing that he is, in fact, a massive dick.

Jeff's favorite part of the issue: Sue Storm kicking someone in the butt while invisible.

Jeff’s favorite part of the issue: Sue Storm kicking someone in the butt while invisible.

1:44:41-1:53:00: I call Fantastic Four #8 “another [issue] full of important shit,” including the first appearance of the Puppet Master — who, for once, is an actual threat and gets the best exit of his fictional life — as well as Alicia, Reed’s quest to cure the Thing and much more. Jeff suggests that perhaps Lee and Kirby have a future in this comic book business, because this is clearly the stage of recording where we’re into hyperbole. (To his credit, he also has some great points to make about why this issue is more fairy-tale-like than the earlier issues.)
1:53:00-2:05:47: There’s a lot going for Fantastic Four #9 — the greatest introduction of the Sub-Mariner in any comic ever, for one — but we talk about the expressiveness of Kirby’s Thing, even at this early stage, the greatness of Kirby’s Hollywood caricatures, and Namor’s willingness to do whatever it takes to fuck Sue Storm. That said, there’re a couple of majorly objectionable things in this issue, with some staggering racism and sexism at play here in a way that’s not been visible in the series before (and it’s hardly been an unsexist series to this point). I also explain to Jeff why Paul Gambaccini isn’t just a pre-Internet troll, but here’s a little bit more context as to why I was familiar with him; his letter to Stan Lee, however, is a thing of greatness. Jeff, meanwhile, likens this issue with the real-world cinematic fortunes of the Fantastic Four. Is Roger Corman the Sub-Mariner?

The Best Namor.

The Best Namor.

2:05:47-2:19:18: Who is flagging more by this point, Jeff and me or Lee and Kirby? Here’s a clue: Fantastic Four #10 is an issue that features Lee and Kirby actually appearing in the comic itself to bemoan the fact that they can’t come up with another villain as memorable as Doctor Doom. That said, I’m fully expecting someone to pop up in the comments and tell us that we’re very, very wrong when it comes to the science of flames and being able to burn when cold, because that’s what happens when you talk so boldly about such subjects on the Internet. Nonetheless, Doctor Doom returns, with some wonderfully un-Doom-like dialogue and the greatest theory about dinosaurs that has ever existed. Nonetheless, Jeff has theories about the uber-consistency of Doom in a way that you suspect that Doom himself would approve of. Less likely to be approved of: the Sue Storm pin-up in the issue, and specifically, the caption that accompanies it. We also discuss both the rarely-discussed superpowers, and never-discussed parentage, of Alicia Masters, and I make a joke that might be construed as able-ist re: Battlin’ Jack Murdock’s children that I kind of regret. (Sorry, people who might be offended! I didn’t mean to offend you!)

Inarguably the highlight of Fantastic Four #10

Inarguably the highlight of Fantastic Four #10

2:19:18-2:27:45: Fantastic Four #11 features the Fantastic Four reading their mail and meeting the Impossible Man for the first time. Guess which of those two things we spend more time talking about? Jeff does have some interesting thoughts about possible roots for Impy’s origins, however. There’s also a new origin of the Fantastic Four and an important revelation about Reed Richards’ past, and Stan Lee demonstrates why he really shouldn’t try and tackle sexism as an important topic. (Entirely unrelated to the Fantastic Four, Jeff also discovers the previously-unknown link between Dave Sim and Dim Sum.)

Reed and Ben aren't going to take sexism lightly -- unless it's THEIR sexism!

Reed and Ben aren’t going to take sexism lightly — unless it’s THEIR sexism!

2:27:45-2:36:04: Both Jeff and I are fairly non-plussed by Fantastic Four #12, which puts the team on the trail of the Hulk. There are some Avengers re-read flashbacks, and we talk about the need for the series to actually be centered around the Fantastic Four themselves, and the way in which the Hulk defeated the two men who created him.
2:36:04-end: In which we finally reach the end, talk (briefly) about which of the issues worked and didn’t work in the first 12, and tell you where you can find us on the Internet: Twitter, Tumblr and Patreon, where 94 people are helping us record things like this.

This, then, is the beginning of the World’s Greatest Magazine Podcast. We hope you enjoy it, and will stick with us as we power through the rest of the first volume of the series. (We’ll try to make episodes shorter in future, too.)

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail